<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Binary Tendencies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://binarytendencies.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://binarytendencies.com</link>
	<description>binarytendencies.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>CSS Performance</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/css-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/css-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just read an interesting article over at jpsykes.com; testing css performance (pt 2).  His conclusion is that using child selectors are slower than using direct class name declarations (in some browsers).
Head on over and read for yourself!
NOTE! Just noticed that part 3 of his testing css article series is out. Check it out.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read an interesting article over at jpsykes.com; <a href="http://jpsykes.com/152/testing-css-performance-pt-2" target="_blank">testing css performance (pt 2)</a>.  His conclusion is that using child selectors are slower than using direct class name declarations (in some browsers).</p>
<p>Head on over and read for yourself!</p>
<p>NOTE! Just noticed that part 3 of his testing css article series is out. <a href="http://jpsykes.com/153/more-css-performance-testing-pt-3" target="_blank">Check it out</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/css-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margin error in Firefox?</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/margin-error-in-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/margin-error-in-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[margin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[opera]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webdesign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m currently working on a webdesign with a centered div, and what&#8217;s really irritating is that in Firefox the entire div moves when the content goes below the screen length. Firefox shows the scrollbar and moves the entire page abit to the left. Why does it do that?? IE doesn&#8217;t! I have tried with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently working on a webdesign with a centered div, and what&#8217;s really irritating is that in Firefox the entire div moves when the content goes below the screen length. Firefox shows the scrollbar and moves the entire page abit to the left. Why does it do that?? IE doesn&#8217;t! I have tried with the latest beta of Firefox 3, and same thing happens there.</p>
<p>If you want to test this yourself open <a href="http://blog.html.it/layoutgala/LayoutGala34.html">this css layout</a> over at <a href="http://blog.html.it/layoutgala/">Layout Gala</a> in Firefox, and keep clicking the &#8220;Add Text to this section&#8221; link in the content area until the content goes below the screen length. When Firefox adds the scrollbar at the right side it shifts the entire page to the left.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Surely this must be a bug?</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Update</span>: I just checked using Opera and the same thing happens.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Update2</span>: After <a href="http://www.dave-woods.co.uk/index.php/firefox-scrollbar-fix/" target="_blank">googling around</a> some, I found the solution to this &#8220;problem&#8221;. <br />
The following CSS will make sure the vertical scrollbar are always present:</p>
<pre>html {overflow-y: scroll;}</pre>
<p>Glad I sorted that out! Now I can consentrate on the design again. <img src='http://binarytendencies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Update3</span>: This is still a &#8220;problem&#8221; in Opera. At least with version 9.27.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/margin-error-in-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Script compression pt.2 - Enter PHP Speedy</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/script-compression-pt2-enter-php-speedy/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/script-compression-pt2-enter-php-speedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[compression]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[speed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the failure of getting Script Compressor to work, I decided to test out PHP Speedy by Leon Chevalier. A plugin that is suppose to to the same thing as Script Compressor.
There is one big difference though.. PHP Speedy works!
I timed the average load time of my blog page with, and without, the plugin activated. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the <a href="http://binarytendencies.com/tests/script-compressor-plugin-not-working/">failure of getting Script Compressor to work</a>, I decided to test out <a title="PHP Speedy" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/aciddrop.com/php-speedy/?referer=http://binarytendencies.com/wp-admin/edit.php');pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/aciddrop.com/php-speedy/?referer=http://binarytendencies.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=18&amp;message=4');" href="http://aciddrop.com/php-speedy/" target="_blank">PHP Speedy</a> by Leon Chevalier. A plugin that is suppose to to the same thing as <a title="Script Compressor" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/rp.exadge.com/2008/04/30/script-compressor/?referer=http://binarytendencies.com/wp-admin/edit.php');" href="http://rp.exadge.com/2008/04/30/script-compressor/" target="_blank">Script Compressor</a>.</p>
<p>There is one big difference though.. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">PHP Speedy works</span>!</p>
<p>I timed the average load time of my blog page with, and without, the plugin activated. Here are the results:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Without PHP Speedy</td>
<td>1.12s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>With PHP Speedy at default settings</td>
<td>1.19s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>With PHP Speedy, gzip page on, and footer text/image off</td>
<td>0.97s</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see the default settings didn&#8217;t work too well with me. But then again. I only have a small css file, and no javascript. Given a &#8220;heavier&#8221; site I think the default settings would work better. But as you see when I tweaked to settings a bit you see the plugin doing it&#8217;s job! Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/script-compression-pt2-enter-php-speedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Script Compressor plugin not working?</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/script-compressor-plugin-not-working/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/script-compressor-plugin-not-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[compression]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[script]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I downloaded and installed the Script Compressor plugin with the intent to check how much faster the blog would load with scripts compressed. I don&#8217;t have much javascript on my site, so I thought I would start out with just the css compression.
But I can&#8217;t see any difference in the css file. Isn&#8217;t it working? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded and installed the <a title="Script Compressor" href="http://rp.exadge.com/2008/04/30/script-compressor/" target="_blank">Script Compressor</a> plugin with the intent to check how much faster the blog would load with scripts compressed. I don&#8217;t have much javascript on my site, so I thought I would start out with just the css compression.</p>
<p>But I can&#8217;t see any difference in the css file. Isn&#8217;t it working? I&#8217;m checking the css using Firebug and the size stays the same, and the structure in the file is the same also. I thought the script was suppose to remove blank lines and comments etc, but all comments are intact in the file.</p>
<p>Am i using it wrong? Are there anyone out there that get this to work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/bugs/script-compressor-plugin-not-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Release: New Elite - a SandBox theme</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/themes/release-newelite-a-sandbox-theme/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/themes/release-newelite-a-sandbox-theme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Themes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[elite]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sandbox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the first release-version of my remake of the Elite theme. It is based on the SandBox theme and will not work without that installed. Hope you like it!
Download it here: newelite
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the first release-version of my remake of the <a title="Elite" href="http://wpzone.net/free-wordpress-themes/elite/" target="_blank">Elite</a> theme. It is based on the <a title="SandBox" href="http://www.plaintxt.org/themes/sandbox/" target="_blank">SandBox</a> theme and will not work without that installed. Hope you like it!</p>
<p>Download it here: <a href="http://binarytendencies.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/newelite.zip">newelite</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/themes/release-newelite-a-sandbox-theme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed up your postview using paginated comments</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speed-up-your-postview-using-paginated-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speed-up-your-postview-using-paginated-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[loadtime]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have a post with a lot of comments, surely it must be some speed gain from just showing, say ten at the time? To test this I installed the Paginated Comments plugin by James Maurer and created a test post with 12 comments. I configured the plugin to show only 10 comments (this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a post with a lot of comments, surely it must be some speed gain from just showing, say ten at the time? To test this I installed the <a title="Paginated Comments" href="http://www.badspiderbites.com/paginated-comments/" target="_blank">Paginated Comments</a> plugin by James Maurer and created a test post with 12 comments. I configured the plugin to show only 10 comments (this is in fact the default setting), and started testing.</p>
<p>I first timed the loading of the post with the plugin turned off. The average loadtime was 1.18s. I then timed it with the plugin turned on, and after clicking the show all link, thus showing all 12 comments. This time the average loadtime was 1.2s. Not much difference, but a slight increase in loadtime as was expected.</p>
<p>Now I timed the page with only 10 comments showing, and this time the average loadtime was 1.09s. I also timed the page with only the 2 remaining comments showing and got an average loadtime of 1.03s.</p>
<p>So it seems you can indeed decrease the loadtime of the post by limiting the comments.</p>
<p>Note that this test was done on a fresh install of WordPress, and the 12 comments used were just short ones. I would love for someone to do a similar test on a post with ALOT of (long) comments. If you do, let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speed-up-your-postview-using-paginated-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theme optimization tips</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tips/theme-optimization-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tips/theme-optimization-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this great post on Pro Blog Design. If you are not changing themes often, this is a great tip.. to delete dynamic tags from you theme, to improve server load.
Some day I will do a speedtest on this 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found <a title="13 Tags to Delete From your Theme" href="http://www.problogdesign.com/general-tips/13-tags-to-delete-from-your-theme/" target="_blank">this great post</a> on <a title="Pro Blog Design" href="http://www.problogdesign.com/" target="_blank">Pro Blog Design</a>. If you are not changing themes often, this is a great tip.. to delete dynamic tags from you theme, to improve server load.</p>
<p>Some day I will do a speedtest on this <img src='http://binarytendencies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tips/theme-optimization-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speedtest 5: Contact Forms</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-5-contact-forms/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-5-contact-forms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[forms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time I decided to check out the different contact forms plugins for WordPress. Some of them are just simple contact forms where you have no options for customization, and others lets you build your own forms from scratch.
The plugins where you could build your own forms all came with a default form, with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time I decided to check out the different contact forms plugins for WordPress. Some of them are just simple contact forms where you have no options for customization, and others lets you build your own forms from scratch.</p>
<p>The plugins where you could build your own forms all came with a default form, with the exception of FormBuilder. Before I could test this plugin I created a simple contact me form. cformsII lets you turn on/off ajax feature on the forms, but I couldn&#8217;t detect any difference in loadtime either way.</p>
<p>The tests where all done on a fresh install of WordPress, using Firefox and Firebug.</p>
<p>The plugins I decided to test are:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="WP_ContactMe" href="http://www.dcoda.co.uk/index.php/2008/04/30/wp_contactme-101/" target="_blank">WP_ContactMe</a> 1.0.1 by DCoda Ltf</li>
<li>WP-ContactForm 1.5 by Ryan Duff and Peter Westwood</li>
<li><a title="SimpleModal Contact Form (SMCF)" href="http://www.ericmmartin.com/projects/smcf/" target="_blank">SimpleModal Contact Form (SMCF)</a> 1.1.3 by Eric Martin</li>
<li><a title="FormBuilder" href="http://truthmedia.com/wordpress/formbuilder" target="_blank">FormBuilder</a> 0.57 by TruthMedia Internet Group</li>
<li><a title="Contact Form 7" href="http://ideasilo.wordpress.com/2007/04/30/contact-form-7/" target="_blank">Contact Form 7</a> 1.7.7 by Takayuki Miyoshi</li>
<li><a title="cformsII" href="http://www.deliciousdays.com/cforms-plugin" target="_blank">cformsII</a> 8.4 by Oliver Seidel</li>
</ul>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Plugin</td>
<td>WP_ContactMe</td>
<td>WP-ContactForm</td>
<td>SMCF</td>
<td>FormBuilder</td>
<td>Contact Form 7</td>
<td>cformsII</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JS</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>jquery</td>
<td>prototype</td>
<td>Yes, 3</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Custom forms</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Yes</td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Insert method</td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Avg. loadtime</td>
<td style="background-color: #00ff00;">1.24s</td>
<td>1.34s</td>
<td>2.39s</td>
<td>2.8s</td>
<td style="background-color: #ff0000;">3.17s</td>
<td style="background-color: #00ff00;">2.65s</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Note!</strong> The SimpleModal Contact Form (SMCF) required me change my theme, so I decided to drop it from the test, as all others are &#8220;Plug-and-play&#8221;.</p>
<p style="color: #ff0000; text-decoration: underline;">UPDATE! After checking the installation instructions for SMCF it seems you can indeed insert this form without altering any themes. You just have to create a post or a page, and enter a link with a certain class. This link will then open the contact form.  The average loadtime of SMCF can therefor be a bit inaccurate since it was taken on different day than the rest. But as you can see, it is the fastest of the javascript-using plugins <img src='http://binarytendencies.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
If you just want a simple form for your readers to contact you, you are better off with either WP_ContactMe or WP-ContactForm. But if you want to be able to customize your own forms, cformsII is the &#8220;fastest&#8221; of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-5-contact-forms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speedtest 4: Are you feeling social today?</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-4-are-you-feeling-social-today/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-4-are-you-feeling-social-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time I have decided to speedtest social plugins.. you know, the ones that lists small icons for  you to bookmark your post or page on different social websites.
I quickly found out that there are quite alot of these plugins. Most of them just inserts a list of icons at the bottom of your post or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time I have decided to speedtest social plugins.. you know, the ones that lists small icons for  you to bookmark your post or page on different social websites.</p>
<p>I quickly found out that there are quite alot of these plugins. Most of them just inserts a list of icons at the bottom of your post or page.  There are also some that comes as a widget, and some that is linked to an external site, such as <a title="ShareThis" href="http://sharethis.com/index" target="_blank">ShareThis</a>. But it is the ones that inserts icons on your page or post that I&#8217;m testing today.<span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p>The test was done on a fresh install of WordPress with no other plugins activated. I used Firefox and Firebug to do the speedtesting. The plugins were configured to show 5 icons each, with the exception of Slashdigglicious and SocialList which don&#8217;t let you choose which sites you want to show, and ob-textonly-social-bookmarker which is text only.</p>
<p>The testet plugins are:</p>
<ol>
<li><a title="Bookmarkify" href="http://www.gara.com/projects/bookmarkify/" target="_blank">Bookmarkify</a> 0.9.1 by Gary Keorkunian</li>
<li><a title="Bookmark Me" href="http://www.satollo.com/english/wordpress/bookmark-me" target="_blank">Bookmark Me</a> 1.1.4 by Satollo</li>
<li><a title="ob-textonly-social-bookmarker" href="http://www.oraclebrains.com/?page_id=133" target="_blank">ob-textonly-social-bookmarker</a> 2.0 by Rajender Singh</li>
<li><a title="obsocialbookmarker" href="http://www.oraclebrains.com/?page_id=132" target="_blank">obsocialbookmarker</a> 5.3.3 by Rajender Singh</li>
<li><a title="Slashdigglicious" href="http://www.tsaiberspace.net/blog/2007/07/15/slashdigglicious/" target="_blank">Slashdigglicious</a> 1.0.5 by Robert Tsai</li>
<li><a title="Sociable" href="http://www.joostdevalk.nl/wordpress/sociable/" target="_blank">Sociable</a> 2.6.5 by Joost de Valk</li>
<li><a title="Social Bookmarking RELOADED" href="http://www.valent-blog.eu/social-bookmarking-reloaded/" target="_blank">Social Bookmarking RELOADED</a> 2.9 by Valent</li>
<li><a title="Social Bookmarks" href="http://www.dountsis.com/projects/social-bookmarks" target="_blank">Social Bookmarks</a> 4.0.65 by Apostolos Dountsis</li>
<li><a title="SocialList" href="http://sociallist.org/plugin-wp.php" target="_blank">SocialList</a> 1.5 by Codemaster</li>
<li><a title="SociBook" href="http://sozial-bookmark.phpwelt.net/wordpress-plugin.html" target="_blank">SociBook</a> 0.8 by Erik Sefkow</li>
<li><a title="TimesURL.at Sociable Plugin" href="http://timesurl.at/plugins/sociable/" target="_blank">TimesURL.at Sociable Plugin</a> 1.4 by Justin Hartman</li>
</ol>
<p> </p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="90%" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Plugin</strong></td>
<td><strong>1</strong></td>
<td><strong>2</strong></td>
<td><strong>3</strong></td>
<td><strong>4</strong></td>
<td><strong>5</strong></td>
<td><strong>6</strong></td>
<td><strong>7</strong></td>
<td><strong>8</strong></td>
<td><strong>9</strong></td>
<td><strong>10</strong></td>
<td><strong>11</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Size</td>
<td>137KB</td>
<td>23.5KB </td>
<td>6.89KB </td>
<td>371KB </td>
<td>11KB </td>
<td>167KB </td>
<td>228KB</td>
<td>423KB</td>
<td>39.3KB </td>
<td>189KB </td>
<td>145KB </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Icons</td>
<td>favicon</td>
<td>local</td>
<td>no</td>
<td>local</td>
<td>favicon </td>
<td>local</td>
<td>local</td>
<td>local</td>
<td>external </td>
<td>external </td>
<td>local</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CSS</td>
<td>no</td>
<td>no</td>
<td>no </td>
<td>no</td>
<td>no</td>
<td>yes/no</td>
<td>yes</td>
<td>yes</td>
<td>external </td>
<td>no</td>
<td>yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JS</td>
<td>no </td>
<td>no </td>
<td>no </td>
<td>yes</td>
<td>no </td>
<td>no</td>
<td>no </td>
<td>no</td>
<td>external</td>
<td>external </td>
<td>yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Load</td>
<td style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff66">800ms</td>
<td>1.18s</td>
<td style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff66">986ms</td>
<td style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ff3300">5.79s</td>
<td>1.52s</td>
<td>1.46s</td>
<td>1.5s</td>
<td>1.46s</td>
<td>2.32s</td>
<td style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff66">714ms </td>
<td>1.8s </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Notes!</strong> The load times are average of 5 page refreshes. The Sociable plugin let&#8217;s you use the plugin without a CSS file, this shaves off some milliseconds.  Remember, this test is done with pageload in mind, so ease of use, options etc is not taken into account.</p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;"><strong><span style="color: #000000;">Conclusion</span></strong><br />
</span>There are two plugins that stand out here. And that is Bookmarkify and SociBook, they both have average pageloads of under 1 second. Ob-textonly-sociable-bookmarker also loads under 1 second, but this plugin uses no images. But overall, all the plugins are reasonable fast to load, with the exception of obsocialbookmarker with an average pageload of almost 6 seconds, due to the use of loads of javascript!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-4-are-you-feeling-social-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speedtest 3: flickr vs Media Gallery</title>
		<link>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-3-flickr-vs-media-gallery/</link>
		<comments>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-3-flickr-vs-media-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bnry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media gallery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://binarytendencies.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just did a quick speedtest between inserting a photo from flickr vs using a photo uploaded to the local WP Media Gallery.
This is the results:
Photo from flickr
Average loading time: 1.32s
Photo from Media Library
Average loading time: 1.39s
Not much difference there. The test was done on a fresh install of Wordpress with no plugins installed. Firefox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did a quick speedtest between inserting a photo from flickr vs using a photo uploaded to the local WP Media Gallery.</p>
<p>This is the results:</p>
<p><strong>Photo from flickr</strong><br />
Average loading time: 1.32s</p>
<p><strong>Photo from Media Library</strong><br />
Average loading time: 1.39s</p>
<p>Not much difference there. The test was done on a fresh install of Wordpress with no plugins installed. Firefox and Firebug was used in the speedtest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://binarytendencies.com/tests/speedtest-3-flickr-vs-media-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
